Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:11

Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s something you’ve learned that you think everyone should know, but nobody talks about?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
An old Capitol Hill troublemaker is trying to clinch a megabill deal - Politico
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Bicycling tied to reduced dementia risk and greater hippocampal volume retention - Medical Xpress
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Horoscope for Tuesday, June 24, 2025 - chicago.suntimes.com
Thank you.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What To Expect In Wednesday's Report On Inflation - Investopedia
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Earth’s oldest living creature unearthed—dating back 700 million years - The Brighter Side of News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
US growth likely to slow to 1.6% this year, hobbled by Trump's trade wars, OECD says - ABC News